All Features
A trainer is a member you gave a role to, not a second account to keep in step.
In any system where an instructor's account is separate from the account she trains on, somebody ends up maintaining two profiles for one person. Here it is one person with a role, permission is checked on the action rather than merely hidden from the menu, and every sensitive action is recorded with the name behind it.
The coach who teaches the 07:00 books into the afternoon class from the same account.
Whoever is on the desk does not see the money. Permission is checked on the action, not just hidden.
A refund or a permission change needs a second confirmation, even mid-shift.
Every staff action is recorded with the name behind it.
Roster, who is new to the class and who has signed a form, from her phone.
What needs doing at the desk today, and who marked it done.
They sign in with their own phone, not a password somebody dictated.
Instructor, front desk, manager, or a combination you define.
They see exactly what the role allows, and nothing beyond it.
An action log with the name, the time and what was done.
Yes, on the same account. That is the point: one person with a role rather than two profiles somebody has to remember to update.
Yes. Money is its own permission, and the check happens on the action rather than only on what appears in the menu.
Remove the role. The history of what they did stays, and they remain an ordinary member if they train with you.
The first conversation is questions, not a deck.